March 20, 2007

21st-century dilemma: Jimmy Choo vs D&G

Gang rape - or murder by drowning. Which is worse?


...and which one was banned?

7 comments:

Michael said...

D&G, 'cause women have to be protected, yesss. And see this: http://loveyourbody.nowfoundation.org/offensiveads.html

Jetpacks said...

The D&G ad has been much maligned for its supposed depiction of gang rape. But those gay guys aren't doing anything but harrassing a woman who was after one of their crew. There will be no multi-partner action here, although her raised hips would suggest she's not entirely against the idea.

FishNChimps said...

I'm sure those male models were in that ultra-gay film "300" which I'm looking forward to seeing tomorrow.

FishNChimps said...

Interesting website, michael

bettyboop in jakarta said...

The six-packs are great. I would have to agree with Jetpacks though. However, the Jimmy Choo is highly irresponsible. High heels are not fun and games, especialy within close vicinity of a pool. Tsk tsk. What message does this promote to fashionistas across the world? Yep, I am sleep deprived.

copyranter said...

yeah, banning that D&G ad was horseshit. gimme a break.

Alexis Mullino said...

The second one is actually a bit startling.